[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Volume 25, Issue 3 (2019) ::
Iran J Forensic Med 2019, 25(3): 157-164 Back to browse issues page
Responsibility of Cosmetic Surgeons with Three Bases of Fault Statistics, Fault Theory and Risk Theory
A. Salarzai
Jurisprudence & Principles of Islamic Law Department, Theology Faculty, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran , amir_hsalar@theo.usb.ac.ir
Abstract:   (754 Views)
Aims: Often, many young people and teenagers impose huge costs and time on families and society on cosmetic surgery, while their action is not based on the origin of the disease and doesn't provide health for them. Lack of balancing and preventive laws for the prevention of exceeding these actions causes numerous judicial cases and causes the medical community to ignore its original mission, in spite of their oath to ensure the health of the community. Now, the question is what basis of responsibility for cosmetic surgeons is more consistent and closer to justice? Therefore, the aim of this research was to investigate the responsibility of cosmetic surgeons with three bases of fault statistics, fault theory, and risk theory. The research was conducted with the descriptive-analytical method by searching in the relevant sources.
Conclusion: Among the types of principles of responsibility for cosmetic surgeons, in the more or less complicated process of medical practices, the risk theory is closer to the social justice and social interest of the target community.
Keywords: Physician, Responsibility, Fault Statistic, Cosmetic Surgery, Disease, Risk Theory
Full-Text [PDF 700 kb]   (155 Downloads)    
Article Type: Analytical Review |
Received: 2018/05/29 | Accepted: 2019/06/10 | Published: 2019/09/21
1. Hornby AS, Cowie AP. Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current English. 26th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987. p. 722. [Link]
2. McHardy Sinclair J. Collins Cobuild dictionary of idioms. London: Harper Collins; 1995. [Link]
3. Amid H. Amid dictionary. Tehran: Amir Kabir; 1999. p. 1798. [Persian] [Link]
4. Alizadeh A. Criminal responsibility.1st Edition. Tehran: Gol Maryam; 2010. p. 20. [Persian] [Link]
5. Jafari Langroudi MJ. Extensive in terminology of law. 2nd Edition. Tehran: Library of Ganj Danesh; 2002. p. 3. [Persian] [Link]
6. 'Odeh A. Islamic criminal law (Al-tashri' al-jenaei al-Islami). Cairo: Al-Maktabah al- Tawfiqiyqh; 2009. p. 390. [Arabic] [Link]
7. Mozaffar MR. The logic (Al-mantegh). 3rd Edition. Qom: Dar al-Tafsir; 1999. p. 18. [Arabic] [Link]
8. Motahari M. Introduction to Islamic sciences (logic -philosophy). Volume 1. 22nd Edition. Tehran: Sadra Publications; 1998. p. 28. [Persian] [Link]
9. Allameh Helli Hasan ibn Yousof. Trimming the logic (Tajrid al-mantegh). 1st Edition. Qom: Bidar Publication; 2009. p. 64. [Arabic] [Link]
10. Razi Mohammad ibn Zakariya. The spiritual medicine (Al-Teb al-ruhani). 1st Edition. Tehran: The Cultural Works Association; 2005. p. 4. [Arabic- Persian] [Link]
11. Goodarzi F, kiani M. Forensic medicine for law students. 11th Edition. Tehran: SAMT; 2014. p. 11. [Persian] [Link]
12. Emami H. Civil rights. Volume 1. Thran: Islamiah Book Store; 2005. pp. 586-7. [Persian] [Link]
13. Katouzian N. Civil rights; civil responsibility. 1st Edition. Tehran: Tehran University Press; 1991. p. 200. [Persian] [Link]
14. Mostafavi MK. The rules (Al-qava'ed). 7th Edition. Qom: Al-Nashr al-Islami; 2008. p. 284. [Arabic] [Link]
15. Safaei H, Rahimi H. Civil Liability. 3rd Edition. Tehran: SAMT; 2012. pp. 146-7. [Persian] [Link]
16. Lotfi A. The causes of compulsory guarantee in the Islamic jurisprudence and law of Iran. 1st Edition. Tehran: Majd Publication; 2000. pp. 188-9. [Persian] [Link]
17. Khoei A. Finishing the way. (Takmelat al-menhaj). Volume 2. Beirut: Dar al-Zahra; 1395. p. 221. [Arabic] [Link]
Send email to the article author

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Salarzai A. Responsibility of Cosmetic Surgeons with Three Bases of Fault Statistics, Fault Theory and Risk Theory. Iran J Forensic Med. 2019; 25 (3) :157-164
URL: http://sjfm.ir/article-1-951-en.html

Volume 25, Issue 3 (2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله پزشکی قانونی Scientific Journal of Forensic Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4140